On June 9, 2012, the Tiananmen Gate in Beijing was visible at sunset following a rain shower. (Photo by Lintao Zhang/Getty Images)
[People News] When unusual events occur, there is often something suspicious behind them. In November 2026, NVIDIA CEO Huang Renxun admitted to having an extramarital affair with Huang Le, a former executive of the Singapore data centre company Megaspeed. U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that Huang Le had been recruited by the Ministry of State Security of the CCP, with responsibilities that included gathering intelligence on Huang Renxun and facilitating the flow of high-end AI chips to China.
The scandal involving both Huangs was initially reported by the left-leaning American media outlet The New York Times, followed by the Financial Times. In response, Huang Renxun quickly sent an apology email to all employees, and NVIDIA's board launched an independent investigation, leading to fluctuations in the company's stock price. Three committees of the U.S. Congress have begun to intervene in the investigation.
The spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Communist Party of China (CPC) has once again quickly shifted blame, asserting that American media are 'spreading rumours and slandering.' This strong denial from official sources is consistent with the CPC's typical strategy for dealing with espionage scandals. However, it is unusual that public opinion in mainland China has suddenly begun to heavily discuss the double yellow scandal. Historically, cases involving CPC spies and infiltration abroad have been extremely sensitive for domestic media and independent platforms, with the Cyberspace Administration and public security agencies suppressing or deleting information whenever possible. The Fang Fang case, which involves close ties and political influence with U.S. congressional members, has seen virtually no information released in mainland China; similarly, the controversies surrounding Qin Gang's infidelity have been tightly controlled across major platforms, where even euphemistic references could lead to account suspensions. Recently, the case involving Zhang Wanying, who is suspected of being directed by Chinese authorities to monitor Lai Ching-te's son, has also faced a total ban domestically. When these cases touch on CPC intelligence tactics or 'honey traps,' the official narrative outright denies them, while also suppressing any related details and rumours of potential connections. This level of secrecy aims to prevent scandals from damaging the Party's esteemed image, thus placing the CPC's united front efforts in a vulnerable position.
This time, however, the situation is entirely different. Mainland media and various self-media platforms across the internet have rallied together, with Hu Xijin stepping in to provide commentary. Outlets like Caixin have delved into Huang Le's background, tracing his career from a private equity firm in Shanghai to a computing power company in Singapore, along with his financial connections. Hu Xijin published an article questioning the U.S. intelligence assessment, asserting that the Chinese intelligence community 'never specifically employs seduction' and 'never requires female intelligence officers to achieve mission objectives through sexual relations.' He characterised the incident as a political manoeuvre by the Democratic Party and establishment figures aimed at targeting Jensen Huang and, in turn, restraining Trump, claiming that 'it has nothing to do with China.' This attitude of 'watching the drama while enjoying melon seeds' sharply contrasts with the previous suppression of public opinion and avoidance of sensitive topics.
When something unusual happens, there is often something suspicious behind it. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) not only appears unconcerned about being in a passive position but also displays a somewhat detached and bizarre mindset, enjoying the spectacle without fear of repercussions. The reason for this lies in the fact that this major incident, at its core, is a narrative that the CCP has intentionally presented to the world. In other words, the CCP is the instigator of Jensen Huang's scandal, the mastermind behind it, and the actual beneficiary both on and off the books.
In contrast to the past: Why is there no 'censorship' this time?
The Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) management of public opinion surrounding overseas espionage cases fundamentally revolves around political security prevention and the control of United Front risks. Several years ago, the Fang Fang espionage case revealed the tactics of the 'Swallow Army' and elite capture. If such information were to circulate widely in mainland China, it would effectively mean a public acknowledgement to the world that the CCP employs sexual enticement and has engaged in long-term infiltration of American political figures. This not only provides adversaries with leverage but could also raise internal national security concerns about the potential loss of control over similar operations. The scandal involving former Foreign Minister Qin Gang relates to the private morals of deputy national-level officials and the power struggles within Zhongnanhai, as well as political security risks in Beijing, which is why it did not spark any significant discussion on domestic networks. The Zhang Wanying case is even more incendiary, directly addressing Taiwan-related issues, which are highly sensitive, resulting in a complete suppression of domestic public opinion.
In contrast, the Huang Le case has been permitted and even officially promoted for three reasons:
First, the CCP has successfully executed the necessary distancing measures. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly denied the espionage allegations, framing the narrative as an American smear campaign. Hu Xijin further redirected the focus back to the internal conflicts within the United States. He argued that if intelligence truly identified Huang Renxun as a spy, why not privately warn him instead of leaking information to the New York Times and Financial Times, allowing public opinion to explode first? Through Hu's comments, the CCP cleverly countered the narrative of American 'political manipulation,' skillfully shifting attention and focus, while also guiding domestic public opinion towards criticism of Huang Renxun, attacking Silicon Valley tycoons, and extensively discussing Trump's loss of power, with the Party Mother remaining completely uninvolved.
Second, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has already secured the leverage it sought. Reports indicate that after 2023, Megaspeed and associated entities procured a significant quantity of high-end computing equipment from NVIDIA through grey channels and third-party nodes, amounting to approximately $4.6 billion. New Tang Dynasty referenced disclosures from American media, revealing that Huang Renxun (Jensen Huang), who has close ties with the CCP, is connected to a female spy named Huang Le. Together with her husband and sister, she established a multinational corporate network in China and Singapore, collaborating to transport around 240,000 NVIDIA AI chips, which are subject to U.S. export controls, to China, with a transaction value of at least $7.5 billion. Regardless of how the U.S. Congress and judiciary ultimately frame the Huang Renxun incident, the high-end chips and computing power that the CCP desired have already begun to materialise. Even if NVIDIA faces repercussions and Huang Renxun suffers personally, the CCP has already made its initial move; the chips are secured, and any ensuing media frenzy is merely self-inflicted harm, damaging themselves by five hundred while wounding the enemy by a thousand.
Third, using others as instruments. In his article 'Why Did the Huang Renxun Scandal Erupt at This Time,' Mr Tang Baiqiao analysed that Huang Renxun fundamentally loves America and Taiwan, but after being ensnared by the CCP, he was compelled to comply with Beijing's demands under coercion, including tacit approval of chip transhipment and lobbying Trump. However, later on, Huang Renxun was unable to fully satisfy the CCP's greater demands, leading to his extramarital affair being weaponised by the CCP as a powerful strike. The CCP excels at dealing harshly with those who initially cooperate but later betray them. This time, the CCP not only leveraged American justice and public opinion to teach Huang Renxun a lesson but also warned other wealthy Chinese and politicians that they still hold many vulnerabilities over them.
Timing and instigators: Who is orchestrating this?
The incident broke out after the U.S. midterm elections, and this was not a coincidence. U.S. intelligence memos had flagged Huang Renxun's misconduct as early as the fall of 2025 to the spring of 2026, with a specific mention in a confidential memo related to Secretary of State Rubio. The Trump administration may have opted to suppress the investigation to protect the U.S. stock market, economic data, and leverage in negotiations with China. Trump even publicly praised Huang Renxun as being exceptionally talented. Following the midterm elections, the political landscape in the U.S. underwent a significant reshuffle, resulting in Trump losing control of both houses of Congress. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) seized this opportunity and utilised pro-CCP outlets like The New York Times to leak information. Establishment hawks within the Republican Party collaborated with left-leaning media to pressure the FBI and Congress into comprehensive intervention, thereby limiting the White House's ability to downplay the Huang Renxun misconduct incident and setting the stage for future efforts to suppress U.S. AI development.
In his article, Mr Tang Boqiao pointed out through a process of elimination that it is unlikely the Trump administration would intentionally tarnish its own members, nor would it choose a channel like The New York Times for such actions. It is also improbable that the Democratic Party would act unilaterally, as this would harm the interests of the CCP, and the relationship between The New York Times and the CCP is quite complex. A sudden influx of AI videos mocking Huang Renxun appeared online, employing tactics reminiscent of the targeted public opinion warfare seen during the Iran War, which further suggests deep involvement from the CCP's cyber forces. The CCP is the primary instigator behind the online harassment of Huang Renxun. This reveals two key points: first, Huang had previously assisted the CCP with unsavoury tasks; second, he later did not fully comply with their directives. Without either of these factors, the CCP would not resort to such harsh measures.
Huang Le is not your typical 'top beauty' or a seasoned public predator; she is a business executive adept at solving supply chain issues, allowing her to get close to her targets. For Huang Renxun, love might merely be a mixed bonus accompanying substantial commercial profits. However, for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Huang Renxun's perspective is overly simplistic; once an extramarital affair is established, it can be used to ensnare someone. If they refuse to comply, they can simply be discarded.
The CCP's Multiple Gains
This situation is almost 'sweet on both ends of the sugarcane' for the CCP.
The deficiencies in chips and computing power have been partially addressed through the grey leasing channels established between Huang Renxun and Huang Le. Even if NVIDIA faces setbacks, the CCP's narrative of domestic alternatives can still be bolstered by Old Huang's chips.
The CCP is sending a clear message to those who do not comply, signalling to the Chinese tycoons who once collaborated that half-heartedness is the most perilous stance. Tang Boqiao specifically warns Silicon Valley and Wall Street: the recent surge of young Chinese women around wealthy individuals is no coincidence; it is part of the CCP's 'Swallow Army' strategy. The Soviet Union has engaged in similar tactics, and the CCP is following suit. 'The CCP is notorious for using sexual scandals to coerce others into submission. Former U.S. Ambassador to China Gary Locke was a victim of this strategy, which ultimately led to a shattered family, a ruined reputation, and his exit from politics. Both Huang Renxun and Gary Locke are Chinese Americans who once held disdain for the CCP, but later fell into the trap set by the Swallows, and when they became disobedient, they were thoroughly discredited. Who will be next?'
The consumption of American strategic temporary gains is at play. This incident threatens to undermine NVIDIA's credibility and the United States' leading position in AI, while placing the Trump administration in a reactive stance, drawing both political parties into a challenging game of politics. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has capitalised on this situation to harvest benefits in the domestic public opinion landscape, allowing public sentiment to vent against 'wealthy infidelity' and 'Silicon Valley scumbags'. Additionally, through opinion leaders like Hu Xijin, the CCP has deftly shifted the blame onto internal conflicts within the U.S., employing a subtle retaliatory strategy.
A Warning from the Case
The case involving Huang Renxun is not just a simple scandal; it represents a complex interplay of 'CCP espionage + AI technology + national security + celebrity morality' within the context of U.S.-China competition. Huang Renxun's infidelity is likely driven by business interests, either as a 'willful offender' or someone 'playing dumb', rather than actively cooperating with CCP spies, ultimately finding himself in a difficult position after being ensnared.
The United States faces a daunting path ahead; it must verify the facts, enforce the law rigorously, and close the loopholes that allow for AI loss, while simultaneously preventing the CCP from using this situation to weaken U.S. AI capabilities. NVIDIA must not be brought down as a whole; otherwise, the CCP would gain a significant advantage. The Trump administration should also recognise the true nature of Xi Jinping and the CCP; Xi Jinping and Beijing do not deserve empathy from the White House.
For observers, it is essential to condemn the CCP's underhanded tactics while also learning from the serious lessons of Huang Renxun's indiscretions. The CCP once easily expelled the Kuomintang, relying on 'beauty + espionage'; fierce general Zhang Lingpu infamously shot his wife, who was a CCP spy. Huang Renxun should embody this wisdom and resolve, or he would not find himself in his current predicament.
(First published by People News) △
News magazine bootstrap themes!
I like this themes, fast loading and look profesional
Thank you Carlos!
You're welcome!
Please support me with give positive rating!
Yes Sure!