Netizens believe that if it weren't for Tianyu Company deliberately suppressing her, given Yu Menglong's talent and popularity, she should have already risen to the status of a top star. (Reposted from Yu Menglong's Weibo)
[People News] Following Yu Menglong's passing, old stories and insider information about her entertainment career have resurfaced. It has come to light that she was treated unfairly by her former agency, Tianyu Media, which internally labelled her as a 'money-losing product,' sparking outrage across the internet.
Tianyu Media is the true money-losing product
According to previous public reports, Yu Menglong attracted attention early in her career due to her looks and charisma, participating in several film and television projects, yet she was long deprived of essential resources. Some netizens have dug up early forum posts and anonymous tips suggesting that there was a significant imbalance in resource distribution within Tianyu Media, where artists who did not engage in certain social activities were easily marginalised.
Reports indicate that Yu Menglong was disparaged as a 'money-losing product' within Tianyu Media because she refused to participate in dining and drinking events, rejecting the 'female capitalist unspoken rules.' Consequently, Tianyu Media suppressed her, preventing her from achieving greater fame. At that time, the public was also quite aware of this situation, having repeatedly pointed out that Yu Menglong's 'resources were limited' and her 'development was hindered.'
Notably, who is the 'female capitalist' associated with these unspoken rules? Anonymous tips have suggested a connection to Tian Hairong, but as of now, no one or evidence has publicly verified this claim, and Tianyu Media has not issued a formal response to such allegations. Yu Menglong herself never publicly accused any specific individual during her lifetime.
After netizens became aware of the situation, they erupted in collective outrage: 'Tianyu is the real money-losing entity; if they hadn’t hidden Mengmeng, she would have already become a top star,' 'If you claim someone is a money-losing product, why not let them go? You’re unhappy but still want to control them. How can you call it a money-losing product? The lost money has just reverted to its original owner,' 'Getting involved in artist management is merely a way to help the powerful find sex slaves and launder money,' 'The most absurd part is that they still cling to this money-losing product and force her to renew her contract,' 'Just go bankrupt; I’m waiting for the day when the stock is worth 0, so I can use it as wallpaper,' 'Indeed, it’s a money-losing product, and it’s also Tianyu’s own fault; just look at how the rotten mango has lost 20 billion, that’s quite satisfying,' 'Mengmeng should have been a first-tier star, but you suppressed and harmed her; (now) the company is truly starting to suffer significant losses, and everyone is waiting to see the villains get their comeuppance, waiting for dawn.'
Parrots are more expensive than them.
On the topic of value, a video has recently gone viral online, featuring a scholar who asks his students: In the People's Republic of China, how many years would someone be sentenced for selling a woman? Referring to Article 241, Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law, it states, 'Those who buy abducted women and children shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention, or control.' The scholar remarks, 'Only three years? Come on, give me a stack, because the same type of crime is not punishable cumulatively.'
The scholar continues, 'How many years would I get for buying a parrot? It’s all under five years; buying two parrots results in over five years, classified as “illegal trade in rare animals and plants.” How many years to buy 20 toads? It’s all under three years.' Thus, one woman is equivalent to 20 toads! 'You can’t even compare to a parrot. Because parrots are more expensive than you.'
The perception that Chinese women under the rule of the Communist Party of China (CPC) are worse off than parrots stems from the previous incident involving the 'chained woman' in Feng County, Xuzhou, Jiangsu. During this incident, many netizens questioned the so-called husband of the 'chained woman', suggesting that he was likely a trafficker, as the case involved human trafficking. The media later revealed that under CPC laws, 'buying a woman can result in a maximum sentence of only three years, while purchasing several parrots can lead to a five-year sentence.'
The issue of 'trafficking women' has ignited extensive discussions, with many netizens arguing that both buyers and sellers of women and children should face equal penalties under the law, including the death penalty.
On the X platform, users commented, 'In the Communist Party of China, the Chinese people are treated worse than livestock. This is not an insult; it is clearly stated in the CPC's constitution,' 'Even with such unjust laws, they have no intention of adhering to them,' 'They do not buy toads, but they buy people; the law is designed to serve them, and when the penalties are absurdly light, it is evident that a majority are complicit.'
However, many did not anticipate that during the three years of the COVID-19 pandemic, CPC leader Xi Jinping would order the enforcement of a strict zero-COVID policy. The 'Big Whites' in white protective suits possess rights that are not constrained by law; if they suspect someone of being infected, they can enter private homes to arrest individuals without testing or identification, confining them to makeshift hospitals.
Such overt actions of arresting individuals in public or entering homes quickly became commonplace.
The safety and well-being of individuals are completely unprotected.
Following three years of the pandemic, authorities have aggressively promoted organ donation, mandating that all students from elementary to university undergo blood tests on the first day of school. This has raised public concerns that the government is using this approach to collect the physiological data of the entire population, facilitating organ matching for recipients. Concurrently, there has been a troubling rise in cases of young students going missing, yet the authorities have remained indifferent. Families who report these disappearances to the police are often met with refusal to accept their reports or to initiate investigations. While some missing students have been fortunate enough to be found, many have tragically been discovered deceased, with their organs often missing. It is clear that the high value of human organs has led to street abductions becoming alarmingly common, leaving the safety of the public in jeopardy.
Recently, several videos have emerged online, indicating that in China, individuals with rare blood types or those whose organs have been matched face the constant threat of being kidnapped in public.
One video depicts a woman in Henan being taken away by hospital staff in handcuffs on the street. The woman is heard crying out for help, claiming she has type O blood, commonly known as
Netizens expressed their outrage, stating: 'Since the park was bombed, the demand has surged, and the Communist bandits are coming directly to source goods day and night.' 'The Communist bandits are openly kidnapping people for organ harvesting; if the people do not rebel under such conditions, their slave mentality is far too strong.' 'When will this evil ever end?' 'Blood types have been matched, and the internal organs are set to be harvested and transplanted.' 'They have already treated the people like pigs, capturing and slaughtering them.' 'If you do not resist today, tomorrow your children will become the organs and blood banks for them and their children walking around.'
In another video, it was reported that on the night of December 27, 2025, in the Jinxiang Apartment in Wenzhou, Zhejiang, a woman was forcibly taken from her home by a group of individuals. The woman struggled and cried out for help, saying, 'I don’t want to go, I don’t want to die, let me go. Help me, help me,' but she was ultimately dragged away against her will. Neighbours did not intervene, nor did the police come to investigate.
The publisher of the video, 'Financial Cold Eye,' commented, 'This group of kidnappers is essentially the police; no one in China feels safe. Anyone can be taken from their home at any moment. Whether it’s a crime, a secret kidnapping, or organ harvesting, this woman could very well disappear from China. All those around the world who promote the idea of good human rights, economic prosperity, and rule of law in China should take a closer look; this is the terrifying reality of the Communist Party of China.'
Netizens expressed their views: "In the past, when the economy was thriving, all issues were easily concealed. Now, with the economy in decline, every problem and wrongdoing is laid bare. They no longer even pretend; since the regime is on the verge of collapse, it’s better to take action and end it themselves!" "These individuals (the kidnappers) have been corrupted by the Communist Party's atheism, which emboldens them to commit any act. They fail to understand that in the future, they will have to pay double for their actions, and that suffering will be theirs to endure. It’s horrifying!" "In Communist China, there’s nothing you can’t think of; there’s nothing they can’t accomplish. The Communist thugs are now engaging in evil without any moral boundaries. The woman seems mentally stable, desperately calling for help. (The kidnappers) have at least committed acts of kidnapping and persecution. As long as the Communist Party exists, disasters will continue. Distance yourself from the Communist Party, and focus on self-preservation!"
(First published by People News) △
News magazine bootstrap themes!
I like this themes, fast loading and look profesional
Thank you Carlos!
You're welcome!
Please support me with give positive rating!
Yes Sure!