The Death of a Dog Caused by a 12-Year-Old in Jieyang Highlights the CCP's Distortion of Human Nature

The Death of a Dog Caused by a 12-Year-Old in Jieyang Highlights the CCP's Distortion of Human Nature (Video)

[People News] Hello, dear viewers, and welcome to "Forbidden News Decryption." I am Sun Ning.

On the afternoon of June 28, 2026, in Pingpu Village, Jieyang City, Guangdong Province, China, the sun blazed down as usual. Little did anyone know that a tragedy challenging the very foundations of human civilization was unfolding in this seemingly tranquil village.

A stray mother dog, referred to as "Wangwang," along with her three puppies, just half a month old, were cornered in an open area by four boys, all aged 12 and in the sixth grade of elementary school. The boys began by beating the puppies with sticks multiple times, using wire to strangle and drag them. They then doused the mother dog, "Wangwang," with flammable liquid and set her ablaze. Throughout this horrific act of violence and the burning that led to the dogs' deaths, the boys laughed and played, shouting, "Roasted dog, it smells so good," while recording the entire incident on their phones and later uploading it online to boast about their actions.

This incident, dubbed the "Wangwang Incident," quickly gained traction online, and the horrific acts depicted in the video left anyone with a conscience feeling suffocated and outraged.

On June 30, 2026, the Jieyang authorities released a statement: Since the four male minors involved in the case are all 'under 14 years old', they are not subject to any criminal responsibility under the current laws of the Communist Party of China. The final outcome is simply to send them to a so-called 'special school' for corrective education and to require their parents to fulfill their guardianship responsibilities. The notice concluded with the authorities reminding netizens in their usual tone of maintaining stability: 'Do not spread related information, refuse online violence.' 

There is no severe legal punishment, no public repentance, and no basic respect for the lives of the victims. The Communist Party of China lightly refers to them as 'minors', effectively closing the case of a brutally cruel murder. 

The Tsunami of Public Opinion 

The tragic death of Wang Wang has breached the moral boundaries of civilized society. Following the Communist Party's announcement, public outrage both domestically and internationally erupted like a tsunami. 

Initially, several prominent figures in the entertainment industry broke their silence and publicly voiced their opinions. Mainland Chinese actor Du Jiang, Taiwanese artist Chen Qiaoen, and Hong Kong artists Ma Junwei and Yuan Wenjie, among others, took to social media to express their anger, condemn the atrocities, mourn the lost lives, and strongly call on the Communist Party government to address the deficiencies in animal protection laws. 

Simultaneously, a mysterious group emerged overnight on major social media platforms—' Wang Wang employees from various regions of China' or 'Wang Wang electronic employees.'

Netizens have been using well-known commercial brands like 'Wang Wang Xianbei' and 'Wang Zai Milk' as a disguise, claiming to be 'employees of Wang Wang Group's various branches across the country' or 'staff of Wang Wang Electronics'. They have been queuing and checking in on online comment sections with statements such as 'I am an employee of Wang Wang in Shashi, Hubei' and 'I am a staff member of Wang Wang Electronics in Ningbo, Zhejiang'.

Simultaneously, this accumulated anger and sadness quickly spilled over from the online realm to the offline world. In Shashi, Hubei, and Ningbo, Zhejiang, many netizens donned homemade 'Wang Wang Family' T-shirts, displayed support symbols on their private vehicles, and even rented small outdoor billboards at their own expense. Late at night on July 25, 2026, in a park in Tongliao City, Inner Mongolia, several young women risked arrest to distribute eco-friendly shopping bags featuring the cartoon image of 'Wang Wang Dog Mom and Puppies' to passersby for free; on July 27, at a large music festival in Shandong, an audience member raised a massive support banner that read 'The world cannot be without puppies' high above the crowd.

The support activities for Wang Wang have rapidly expanded globally in a very short time.

Around the world, countless individuals unwilling to turn a blind eye have come together to raise funds for large advertising screens in some of the most iconic public spaces. In New York's Times Square, the LED wall of Taipei 101, the bustling streets of Mong Kok in Hong Kong, the crowded areas of Shibuya in Tokyo, Japan, as well as the streets of Vancouver, Canada, and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, have all illuminated giant billboards featuring cartoon images of 'Wang Wang' and its mother. These screens display messages in both Chinese and English, including 'Stop Animal Cruelty in China' and 'Speak Up for Wang Wang in Jieyang.' International animal protection organizations, along with multinational entities like the Humane Society International, have formally reached out to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government, urging China to comprehensively enhance its animal protection legal framework and address existing gaps in the system.

The Rise of the Stability Iron Curtain

However, this wave of support from both domestic and international sources has been perceived by the CCP rulers as a highly dangerous political signal. The rapid emergence of these large advertisements overseas has been met with equally extreme measures from the CCP's stability maintenance apparatus. For the CCP, the synchronized display of global landmark screens not only completely undermines its meticulously crafted international image but also triggers its sensitive concerns about 'preventing foreign infiltration' and 'suppressing any signs of grassroots organization.' As a result, a harsh 'river crab' operation has been launched across mainland China.

Online, major platforms such as Douyin, Xiaohongshu, Weibo, and WeChat received top-level control directives from the Cyberspace Administration of China. The algorithm systems operated continuously, leading to a complete ban on keywords like 'Wangwang' and 'Jieyang'. Additionally, accounts and content featuring phrases such as 'Wangwang employees' and 'Wangwang electronics' faced sudden restrictions, bans, and even outright deletions. Numerous animal protection bloggers, who had been tracking case developments and advocating for animal rights, such as 'Mao Haizi's Mao Baba Xiang Qian', were erased within just a few days. The posts of several celebrities who had spoken out publicly just days earlier were also forcibly removed overnight.

Offline, a climate of fear and violent crackdowns has fully taken hold.

The memorial site in Jieyang, adorned with flowers and dog food, was labeled by authorities as a 'gathering security risk'. In a single night, plainclothes officers and sanitation workers collaborated to forcibly clear away all the flowers and cards. The area was cordoned off with police tape, and temporary surveillance cameras were even installed.

Even more troubling was the 'targeted elimination' of volunteers and netizens who voiced their opinions. Several volunteers who participated in the on-site memorial or organized online support were subjected to police 'tea-drinking' sessions and warnings. Some were threatened with 'dismissal from public office if they continued to protest', while others were warned that it would 'affect three generations' ability to take public service exams'. There were even out-of-town volunteers who were expelled overnight by local police from their hotels.

This exemplifies the dark humor under the rule of the Chinese Communist Party: they can tolerate perpetrators who take lives through cruel fire punishments, yet they cannot stand to see a few citizens holding flowers and lighting candles on the street to call for kindness. They are "gentle and considerate" towards the murderers, but they resort to violence against ordinary people who express sympathy, harboring deep-seated hatred.

The Soil that Cultivates Demons

When we watch the video featuring those four 12-year-old children, witnessing the bizarre smiles on their faces that blend innocence with cruelty, and hearing their childish voices exclaiming, "Roasted dog smells so good," every conscientious individual is left with a profound question: is the cruelty of these minors an innate trait, or is it cultivated by their environment?

The harsh truth is cold and brutal: the evil within human nature is never without a source. These four children were not born as demons; they were raised in an environment that disregards life, where power and violence are rampant. It is the tyranny of the Chinese Communist Party that has shaped them into what they are.

In the Chinese Communist regime, children from kindergarten do not receive an education that respects life and shows compassion for the weak; instead, they are taught to worship power and adhere to the jungle law of survival of the fittest.

They witness urban management officers ruthlessly overturning elderly people's vegetable stalls on the streets, trampling vendors like livestock;

They observe, in the name of the so-called "dynamic zero-COVID policy," epidemic prevention personnel openly breaking into homes with iron rods, killing pet cats and dogs in front of their owners;

They see how bulldozers used for forced demolitions roar as they bury villagers who refuse to relocate under the rubble, while the law turns a blind eye to these violent perpetrators wielding public power.

Growing up in such an environment, the next generation has their brains filled with the most distorted logic: as long as you hold power and occupy a position of strength, you can trample on and slaughter lives weaker than yourself without facing any consequences.

To these children, the gentle stray dog "Wang Wang" represents an even lower class than they are, the most defenseless "transparent little one". Consequently, they pick up wooden sticks and lighters, starting to mimic the violent acts they have observed in this country. Through their cruelty towards weak animals, they seek to experience the thrill of wielding dictator-like power over life and death.

These children are not inherently evil; they are simply the most perfect "assembly line products" of this grotesque tyrannical society.

Why hasn’t the Communist Party enacted an "Anti-Animal Cruelty Law"?

Over the past decade, whenever society faces tragedies that cross moral boundaries, such as the "Jack Spicy Strip Cat Abuse Incident" and the "Jieyang Wang Wang Incident", there is always a surge of public demand for the establishment of an "Anti-Animal Cruelty Law" or "Animal Protection Law". Each year during the National People's Congress, a few conscientious representatives propose related motions.

The Communist Party has the largest legislative machinery in the world, capable of passing various oppressive laws that restrict civil liberties overnight and enacting regulations to censor online speech. Yet, why has a law aimed at protecting vulnerable lives, the "Anti-Animal Cruelty Law", been repeatedly postponed and failed to come to fruition after more than a decade of calls? Why does the Communist Party hesitate to introduce the "Anti-Animal Cruelty Law"?

Underlying this situation are two fundamental fears harbored by authoritarian rulers.

The first fear pertains to the logical implications: if even animals cannot be subjected to abuse, what does that mean for humans?

The establishment of the "Animal Cruelty Prevention Law" is grounded in the legal principle that life possesses the inherent right to "be free from torture and arbitrary killing." This represents an extension of the right to life within modern civilization. However, the regime under the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is fundamentally based on the deprivation of human rights and the violent suppression of the populace.

If the law states that abusing a cat or a dog constitutes a crime punishable by law, the public will inevitably follow this legal reasoning and question: if animal abuse is a crime, then what about the abuse of fellow citizens during political movements and in various concentration camps? What about the torture of dissenters in detention centers? What about the physical assaults on marginalized citizens during forced demolitions? What about sealing disaster victims in hallways during emergencies, leaving them to fend for themselves?

The CCP is reluctant to impose a "tightening spell" upon itself. It understands that once the legal framework of "protecting life and respecting life" is established, the awareness of human rights will spread uncontrollably. A society that has learned to respect "dog rights" will certainly not tolerate a government that violates human rights. To maintain its absolute power over 1.4 billion people, it must ensure that society remains numb to violence and unclear about the right to life.

The second fear the CCP has regarding legislation is the apprehension of the demonstration effect of political mobilization: it will not allow the public to compel the government to enact laws through collective protests.

In the totalitarian framework of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), all laws and policies must be viewed as the 'grace of the Party Central Committee' or the 'wise decisions of the Supreme Leader,' and they can never be the result of public pressure.

If the public manages to organize spontaneously, crowdfund for large screens, and engage in nationwide protests to successfully compel the authorities to enact the 'Animal Protection Law,' it will mark a significant victory in the history of contemporary civil movements in China. This experience of 'applying public pressure to the legislature and achieving success' will serve as a profound awakening regarding civil rights for the entire nation.

The public will come to understand: 'We can change the law when we unite; our voices can indeed compel Zhongnanhai to listen.'

However, from the CCP's perspective, if today you can successfully legislate to protect puppies, then tomorrow can you unite to legislate for freedom of speech, for the public disclosure of officials' assets, and for genuine electoral rights? This awakening of political engagement poses a subversive threat to the CCP, which prioritizes 'regime security' as its core interest. Thus, even if it allows the moral decay of society, the proliferation of the slaughter industry, and the next generation to become bloodthirsty and cold-blooded, the CCP will never yield to public opinion.

A Glimmer of Light in the Desert

In the summer of 2026, a tragedy unfolded on the streets of Jieyang, with flames and blood that shocked countless onlookers. It shone like a piercing beam of light, ruthlessly illuminating the severely desolate moral landscape of China. In this environment, there is no compassion for the weak, life lacks dignity, justice is perceived as provocation, and kindness must be communicated through suffocating euphemisms.

The most frightening and insidious aftermath of tyranny is not the wealth it seizes, but rather its ability to pass on indifference, brutality, and a profound contempt for life to the next generation growing up on this land, much like a virus. When a 12-year-old child can watch lives engulfed in flames while laughing and exclaiming 'so fragrant,' it signifies that the future of this nation has already been utterly lost among the ruins.

We must confront a harsh reality: as long as the tyranny of the Chinese Communist Party persists, the systemic indifference on this land will remain unchanged; the logic that allows power to trample on rights will not shift, and the tragedies of abuse and murder in China will continue indefinitely.

Today, what is being burned on the streets of Jieyang is 'Wang Wang'; tomorrow, it could easily become every ordinary person living at the bottom of society, without any security.

Advocating for 'Wang Wang' and giving them a voice is not just about animal rights; it is also about safeguarding the last remnants of kindness and conscience we possess as humans in a land that is heading towards desolation.

That concludes today’s content. If you enjoyed our program, please give us a thumbs up, subscribe, and activate the notification bell. If you have thoughts on the Jieyang 'Wang Wang' incident, we welcome you to leave a comment in the comment section. We’ll see you in the next episode!

(‘Forbidden News Decoded’)
△